| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 21.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock A320M (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170828 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 22 '19 at 17:28 |
| Run Duration | 110 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
64%
Good
|
63% 112 Pts
|
47% 348 Pts
|
21% 344 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85ED) 3GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2252 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.67
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
21.1%
Poor
|
2% 45 fps
|
58% 71.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 63 74 84 81 88 MB/s
|
57.8%
Above average
|
59% 82 MB/s
|
109% 0.83 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
|
43.8%
Average
|
43% 15.2 GB/s
|
41% 14.2 GB/s
|
37% 107 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M Builds (Compare 146 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A320M
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples | 52x |
| Ryzen 5 1400AMD $87Bench 61%, 71,313 samples | 20x |
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 15x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 41x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 16x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $298 |