Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 (all builds)
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130423
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 22 '19 at 20:25
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$47 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 4 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	66.5% Good	Memory 89.5 1-Core 70.6 2-Core 119 59% 92.9 Pts	4-Core 241 8-Core 323 36% 282 Pts	64-Core 322 20% 322 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250 25,802 User benchmarks, average bench 8% MSI(1462 3011) 2GB CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.4.1 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	8.65% Terrible	Lighting 11 Reflection 12 Parallax 14.7 9% 12.6 fps	MRender 8.05 Gravity 11.1 Splatting 10.2 8% 9.8 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.65% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$22 61,417 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 113GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900J13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 188 191 192 193 194 MB/s Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	55.5% Above average	Read 219 Write 123 Mixed 183 SusWrite 190 40% 179 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 49.3 4K Mixed 31.6 106% 35.6 MB/s	DQ Read 27.6 DQ Write 63.3 DQ Mixed 33.9 29% 41.6 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 31GB free Firmware: CC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 92 104 121 105 93 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	58.9% Above average	Read 104 Write 76.2 Mixed 61.3 SusWrite 102 63% 85.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 112%
Multiple Card Reader 32GB 477 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 23GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Read 17.3 Write 16.3 Mixed 10 SusWrite 16.6 20% 15 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1.6 101% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	31.9% Below average	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 9.3 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 10.2 27% 9.5 GB/s	Latency 67.9 59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	64x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	63x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	49x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	26x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	23x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $175

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16