Intel X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive40.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 22 '19 at 23:53
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
42.8% Average
Memory 68.4
1-Core 31.7
2-Core 58.2
37% 52.8 Pts
4-Core 94.8
8-Core 247
19% 171 Pts
64-Core 469
29% 469 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GB-$209
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LH6i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 150 157 160 159 165 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.9% Average
Read 201
Write 179
Mixed 185
SusWrite 156
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 26.6
4K Mixed 16.6
57% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 122
93% 124 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 82%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
112GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 182 188 200 200 199 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.5% Poor
Read 196
Write 94
Mixed 77
SusWrite 193
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 14
4K Mixed 8.5
30% 10 MB/s
DQ Read 16.4
DQ Write 17.1
DQ Mixed 14.8
12% 16.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
235GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 129 130 133 145 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 150
Write 138
Mixed 73.9
SusWrite 136
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
209% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Cruzer 8GB
2GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 5.7 6.7 6.9 6.3 6.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
7.77% Terrible
Read 19.7
Write 3.5
Mixed 7
SusWrite 6.3
10% 9.12 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.3
87% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.77%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5170FH0- 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
53.4% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 25.9
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.6
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback