PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 40% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 26.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A97 R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121114 |
Uptime | 1.9 Days |
Run Date | Jul 23 '19 at 09:01 |
Run Duration | 149 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 32% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
40.1%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1303 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
40%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 44 19 25 19 28 MB/s
|
26.1%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$51
66GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 187 156 158 156 201 MB/s
|
106%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
234GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 136 136 137 134 137 MB/s
|
83.9%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
28.7%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 862x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 640x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 436x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 185x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 158x |
RX 480AMD $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples | 118x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $358 |