Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 5.55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom x5-Z8350 9,056 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	5.55% Terrible	Memory 5.54 1-Core 14.4 2-Core 16.9 7% 12.3 Pts	4-Core 33 8-Core 27.1 4% 30 Pts	64-Core 33.3 2% 33.3 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 5.55% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 16,763 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 7270) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.96% Terrible	Lighting 1.07 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 1.53 1% 1.34 fps	MRender 1.43 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 1.52 1% 1.36 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.96% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SDHC Card 4GB 2,629 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 0GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 7 7.7 9 8.6 9.5 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	6.2% Terrible	Read 18.4 Write 5.5 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 8.4 12% 10 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.8 48% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.2% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HYNIX 1x2GB 4,904 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	7.31% Terrible	MC Read 2.5 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 2.1 8% 2.77 GB/s	SC Read 0.6 SC Write 1.6 SC Mixed 0.4 2% 0.87 GB/s	Latency 447 9% 447 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.31% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16