Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 29 '19 at 04:08
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7940X-$654
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 81.8
1-Core 138
2-Core 280
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 557
8-Core 1,115
99% 836 Pts
64-Core 2,670
165% 2,670 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 93%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 150
Parallax 126
112% 138 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 135
Splatting 102
95% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2316RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 478
Write 447
Mixed 194
83% 373 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 87
4K Mixed 36.8
141% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 122
112% 172 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 99%
Areca ARC-1883-VOL#000 15TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: R001
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 3,894
Write 4,519
Mixed 186
633% 2,866 MB/s
4K Read 197
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 0
346% 95.4 MB/s
DQ Read 0
DQ Write 680
DQ Mixed 4.3
105% 228 MB/s
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
24GB free
Firmware: 526ABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 479
Write 247
Mixed 325
77% 350 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 48.1
167% 61.2 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 233
172% 229 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 94%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
77GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 508
Write 494
Mixed 396
104% 466 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 62.9
214% 75.6 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 359
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
354GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,537
Write 2,340
Mixed 1,758
492% 2,212 MB/s
4K Read 69
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 97.1
320% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,346
DQ Write 1,012
DQ Mixed 1148
867% 1,169 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 77.2
Write 135
Mixed 68
69% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.6
218% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 178
Write 167
Mixed 70
102% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2424 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 56
MC Mixed 34.3
120% 42.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 11.3
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 106%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,651 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $795
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback