Asus GT51CH

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	70.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus GT51CH (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK GT51CH
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171114
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 30 '19 at 14:40
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	35%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	58.1% Above average	Memory 66.7 1-Core 137 2-Core 219 78% 141 Pts	4-Core 267 8-Core 457 44% 362 Pts	64-Core 536 33% 536 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 871C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	70.5% Very good	Lighting 86.1 Reflection 99.7 Parallax 78.7 70% 88.2 fps	MRender 90.1 Gravity 83.6 Splatting 86.6 71% 86.8 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB 50,765 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 154GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0MA020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 148 144 141 138 136 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	Read 346 Write 152 Mixed 152 SusWrite 142 44% 198 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 73 4K Mixed 19 84% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 156 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 141 110% 150 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 91%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1TB free Firmware: MX4OABS0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 164 164 164 164 166 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	87.2% Excellent	Read 140 Write 154 Mixed 50 SusWrite 164 92% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 167% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GU6AFR8N-UH 1x16GB 3,066 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	34.8% Below average	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 10.8 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 11.3 SC Mixed 11 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GT51CH Builds (Compare 188 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 58%

Gunboat

System: Asus GT51CH

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $250Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	168x
Core i7-7700k VHIntelBench 84%, 9,708 samples	10x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	97x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	25x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	15x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	65x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	33x
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	12x

RAM
HMA82GU6AFR8N-UH 1x16GBHynixBench 43%, 3,066 samples	63x
M378A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 5,600 samples	19x
HMA82GU6AFR8N-UH 2x16GBHynixBench 77%, 940 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 106% - Outstanding

Total price: $382

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16