Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1603 v3 1,588 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Memory 72.5 1-Core 63.9 2-Core 138 54% 91.6 Pts	4-Core 325 8-Core 323 43% 324 Pts	64-Core 325 20% 325 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600 15,964 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 354.42 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.14% Terrible	Lighting 3.97 Reflection 4.54 Parallax 3.53 3% 4.01 fps	MRender 5.57 Gravity 4.17 Splatting 1.91 3% 3.88 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.14% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-128 128GB 218 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10D Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 240 Write 220 Mixed 187 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 63.1 4K Mixed 33.6 118% 41.4 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 33.6 64% 129 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 92%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 427GB free Firmware: 1B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1539 1626 1396 1433 1428 1418 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	271% Outstanding	Read 1,606 Write 1,328 Mixed 780 SusWrite 1,473 291% 1,297 MB/s	4K Read 47.7 4K Write 181 4K Mixed 66.4 253% 98.2 MB/s	DQ Read 758 DQ Write 996 DQ Mixed 733 594% 829 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 271% Great: 353%
Hitachi HUS724020AL 2TB 72 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 1TB free Firmware: AA70 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 139 138 136 140 139 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Read 158 Write 154 Mixed 88.8 SusWrite 138 99% 135 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.8 179% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB 2x8GB 1,030 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.6% Below average	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 10.5 MC Mixed 11.5 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 10.9 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 95.8 42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	740x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	376x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	223x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	144x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples	129x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	122x

RAM
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,030 samples	184x
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 93%, 970 samples	177x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	157x

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $440

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16