Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory56.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190214
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateAug 03 '19 at 00:48
Run Duration281 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9920X-$587
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 77
1-Core 122
2-Core 262
83% 154 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 996
87% 742 Pts
64-Core 2,187
135% 2,187 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 199
Reflection 220
Parallax 212
162% 210 fps
MRender 258
Gravity 207
Splatting 139
158% 201 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 149%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
400GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1250 1184 603 603 605 603 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,572
Write 1,449
Mixed 665
SusWrite 808
251% 1,123 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 50.4
203% 84.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,074
DQ Write 1,088
DQ Mixed 1,046
796% 1,069 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 222%
Great: 254%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
406GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 450 446 453 452 294 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 461
Mixed 442
SusWrite 425
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 46.8
167% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 356
268% 360 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 113%
Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
624GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 462 461 461 461 461 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 457
Mixed 419
SusWrite 461
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 96.5
4K Mixed 46.2
160% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 348
264% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%
WD VelociRaptor 500GB-$62
74GB free
Firmware: 04.06A00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 122 121 121 122 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 167
Mixed 107
SusWrite 122
109% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.7
353% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 113%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
301GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 116 116 116 119 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
68% Good
Read 120
Write 120
Mixed 88.7
SusWrite 117
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
167% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 68%
Great: 65%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB
559GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 129 134 134 133 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 136
Write 121
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 132
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 77%
Great: 80%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90
224GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 99 99 98 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 109
Write 108
Mixed 78.2
SusWrite 98.3
73% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.2
224% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST3500641AS 500GB-$76
465GB free
Firmware: 3.AAJ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 58 58 59 59 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 57.3
Write 35
Mixed 41
SusWrite 58.3
35% 47.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2Z2666C16 CMK16GX4M2Z2666C16 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
96.2% Outstanding
MC Read 32
MC Write 51.2
MC Mixed 32.4
110% 38.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 9.8
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 96%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,131
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback