Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230 10,189 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Memory 90.6 1-Core 96.1 2-Core 189 73% 125 Pts	4-Core 376 8-Core 596 60% 486 Pts	64-Core 669 41% 669 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600 15,964 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 331.82 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.23% Terrible	Lighting 3.93 Reflection 4.65 Parallax 3.56 3% 4.05 fps	MRender 5.52 Gravity 4.17 Splatting 2.83 3% 4.17 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.23% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 410GB free (System drive) Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 27 32 37 36 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 13.9 Write 36.6 Mixed 16.8 SusWrite 32.3 18% 24.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.2 44% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung-00CE M393B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GB 1,049 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	98.9% Outstanding	MC Read 40.8 MC Write 39.5 MC Mixed 36.2 111% 38.8 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 13.9 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 66.3 60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 98.9% Great: 98%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

RAM
M393B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsung-00CEBench 85%, 1,049 samples	147x
HMT351R7CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynix-00ADBench 83%, 808 samples	130x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsung-00CEBench 79%, 545 samples	73x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16