ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP 510-p102nv

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP 510-p102nv (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 822A
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161214
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 10 '19 at 22:13
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A12-9800 APU (2016 M.BR) 4,241 User benchmarks, average bench 44% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	Memory 68.1 1-Core 75.1 2-Core 135 55% 92.8 Pts	4-Core 229 8-Core 224 30% 227 Pts	64-Core 222 14% 222 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 M360 1,374 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Device(1B0A 90F3) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.1.2 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Lighting 12.2 Reflection 15.5 Parallax 13.8 10% 13.8 fps	MRender 13.1 Gravity 11 Splatting 17.4 12% 13.8 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 301 293 297 298 295 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 453 Mixed 447 SusWrite 309 96% 427 MB/s	4K Read 38.6 4K Write 84.9 4K Mixed 50.1 168% 57.9 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 295 DQ Mixed 347 257% 341 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 128%
Jmicron Tech 120GB 151 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 68GB free Firmware: 0509 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 67 89 67 67 67 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.3% Below average	Read 210 Write 202 Mixed 162 SusWrite 72.4 36% 162 MB/s	4K Read 17.1 4K Write 31.8 4K Mixed 9.8 55% 19.6 MB/s	DQ Read 106 DQ Write 38.8 DQ Mixed 30.2 34% 58.5 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 68%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 452GB free Firmware: MS2OA800 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 154 154 154 154 154 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	92.2% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 152 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 153 91% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 92.2% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 1x8GB 7,085 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2132 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.4% Poor	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 9.2 26% 9.23 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 8.2 22% 7.8 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback