Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium J4205 1,095 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	30.4% Below average	Memory 33.3 1-Core 50.5 2-Core 98.2 34% 60.7 Pts	4-Core 152 8-Core 190 22% 171 Pts	64-Core 181 11% 181 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 7,629 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4974 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	2.63% Terrible	Lighting 2.9 Reflection 3.42 Parallax 2.44 2% 2.92 fps	MRender 3.95 Gravity 2.8 Splatting 4.57 3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.63% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
AZW-128G 128GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0817A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 317 107 83 68 68 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	49.5% Average	Read 305 Write 298 Mixed 41.3 SusWrite 153 44% 199 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 57.7 4K Mixed 12.2 87% 32.3 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 13.7 DQ Mixed 16.8 25% 49.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 49%
General UDisk 8GB 7,759 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 7GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.6 7.1 6 5.6 6.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	4.46% Terrible	Read 14.4 Write 3 Mixed 1.7 SusWrite 6.1 7% 6.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.46% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	28.7% Poor	MC Read 9.8 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 10.7 33% 11.4 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.57 GB/s	Latency 236 17% 236 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium J4205IntelBench 33%, 1,095 samples	13x
Pentium J4205IntelBench 35%, 25 samples	4x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 7,629 samples	12x
HD Graphics 505IntelBench 2%, 2,850 samples	5x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16