Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	71.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$47 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 4.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	61.8% Good	Memory 80.6 1-Core 63.2 2-Core 141 57% 94.9 Pts	4-Core 234 8-Core 353 36% 293 Pts	64-Core 351 22% 351 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Asus(1043 850A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1634 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	Lighting 90.8 Reflection 93.6 Parallax 91 74% 91.8 fps	MRender 88 Gravity 84.2 Splatting 75.1 67% 82.4 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,014 Write 2038 Mixed 2,128 530% 2,393 MB/s	4K Read 183 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 128 500% 141 MB/s	DQ Read 518 DQ Write 255 DQ Mixed 410 298% 394 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 136GB free Firmware: MX4O SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 100 103 100 100 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	61% Good	Read 113 Write 115 Mixed 40.5 SusWrite 99.1 67% 91.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 13GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 138 140 111 129 161 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Read 112 Write 112 Mixed 90.3 SusWrite 140 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 57GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 95 95 96 92 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	59% Above average	Read 110 Write 104 Mixed 97.3 SusWrite 94.6 75% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 220% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 4x8GB 8,984 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45.5% Average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 16.9 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 9.6 22% 7.63 GB/s	Latency 79.5 50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 63%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	8x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	7x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	6x

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $627

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16