PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 88.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus B150 PRO GAMING/AURA (all builds) |
Memory | 7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160919 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Aug 15 '19 at 18:31 |
Run Duration | 163 Seconds |
Run User | CHE-User |
Background CPU | 39% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
69.6%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.1%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 84 87 89 86 83 MB/s
|
88.1%
Excellent
|
|||
Sandisk Extreme SSD 250GB
194GB free
Firmware: 1012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 197 196 197 197 196 MB/s
|
57.2%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 204 203 204 205 207 MB/s
|
117%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
2TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 201 195 200 198 200 MB/s
|
86.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
61.7%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-6500Intel $70Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 188x |
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 136x |
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 133x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 145x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 90x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 61x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $286 |