Asrock X399M Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics86.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive324% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X399M Taichi  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190221
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 17 '19 at 06:50
Run Duration314 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$798
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 78.1
1-Core 131
2-Core 261
85% 157 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 1,015
90% 765 Pts
64-Core 2,689
166% 2,689 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.68
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 114
Parallax 96.5
89% 106 fps
MRender 98.4
Gravity 101
Splatting 99.7
82% 99.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
340GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2078 2073 2066 2060 2058 2037 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
324% Outstanding
Read 2,696
Write 2,204
Mixed 1,214
SusWrite 2,062
457% 2,044 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 66
228% 79.8 MB/s
DQ Read 473
DQ Write 425
DQ Mixed 456
340% 452 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 324%
Great: 393%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$192
1.5TB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1603 1596 1600 1611 1602 1598 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 1497
Write 1,572
Mixed 1087
SusWrite 1,602
325% 1,439 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 69.7
234% 81.6 MB/s
DQ Read 467
DQ Write 441
DQ Mixed 321
277% 410 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 251%
Great: 282%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
474GB free
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2052 2056 2057 2054 2057 2053 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
310% Outstanding
Read 2,542
Write 2,000
Mixed 1,198
SusWrite 2,055
436% 1,948 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 61.2
202% 70.4 MB/s
DQ Read 462
DQ Write 446
DQ Mixed 452
340% 453 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 310%
Great: 353%
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB
59GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 21 19 20 21 21 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 35
Write 21.3
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 20.9
33% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 8.5
4K Mixed 5.5
506% 7.33 MB/s
DQ Read 9.2
DQ Write 9
DQ Mixed 3.9
473% 7.37 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 113%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
15GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 4.4 5.7 5.6 5.4 5.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
7.6% Terrible
Read 18
Write 12
Mixed 10.3
SusWrite 5
14% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 2.3
125% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.6%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
160% Outstanding
MC Read 66.3
MC Write 63.3
MC Mixed 57.3
178% 62.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 45.7
SC Mixed 32
95% 33.2 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 160%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399M Taichi Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 175%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399M Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,291
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback