Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	53.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD
Memory	9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180412
Uptime	3.9 Days
Run Date	Aug 21 '19 at 01:22
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	33%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	62.8% Good	Memory 76.1 1-Core 85.8 2-Core 176 65% 113 Pts	4-Core 283 8-Core 307 39% 295 Pts	64-Core 303 19% 303 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% XFX(1682 C580) CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.6.1 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	53.4% Above average	Lighting 65.4 Reflection 70.7 Parallax 94.8 53% 76.9 fps	MRender 72.8 Gravity 65.9 Splatting 60.4 54% 66.3 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1Z40102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 67 37 52 59 56 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	43.3% Average	Read 457 Write 381 Mixed 351 SusWrite 98.8 72% 322 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 14.9 4K Mixed 1.1 47% 13.6 MB/s	DQ Read 136 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 32 55% 107 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 118GB free Firmware: MS2OA7L0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 98 110 96 105 87 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	61.5% Good	Read 114 Write 98 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 100 62% 85.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB 22,760 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	62.9% Good	MC Read 23.3 MC Write 24.5 MC Mixed 21.8 66% 23.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 17.6 43% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 88.2 45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD Builds (Compare 1,487 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	680x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	539x
Core i3-6098PIntelBench 62%, 6,133 samples	101x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	206x
GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples	105x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	82x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	61x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	50x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	37x

RAM
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 16,202 samples	248x
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 73%, 22,760 samples	221x
HMA451U6AFR8N-TF 2x4GBHynixBench 68%, 8,569 samples	53x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $107

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16