Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateAug 21 '19 at 03:34
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 71.3
2-Core 124
56% 91.4 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 341
35% 283 Pts
64-Core 363
22% 363 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Asus(1043 83F7) 2GB
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Lighting 37.7
Reflection 40
Parallax 55.2
31% 44.3 fps
MRender 48.8
Gravity 46.5
Splatting 39.4
36% 44.9 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 127 123 123 126 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 401
Write 369
Mixed 304
SusWrite 146
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 59.7
4K Mixed 38.3
127% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 176
151% 222 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 118%
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
125GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 400 397 401 403 402 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 414
Mixed 415
SusWrite 399
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 72.4
4K Mixed 43.8
139% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 218
170% 235 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 123%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
717GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 161 160 159 160 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 149
Write 144
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 158
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.7% Below average
MC Read 16
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 14.6
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 9.3
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback