Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 22 '19 at 12:43
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 89.1
1-Core 118
2-Core 231
83% 146 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 705
74% 591 Pts
64-Core 921
57% 921 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P600
Dell(1028 11BD) 2GB
CLim: 1620 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.70
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 21.3
Reflection 14.4
Parallax 17
17% 17.5 fps
MRender 20.7
Gravity 19.1
Splatting 19.3
16% 19.7 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba OCZ RD400 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$4
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 57CZ4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 724 680 762 703 277 149 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 1211
Write 902
Mixed 759
SusWrite 549
191% 855 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 45
170% 65.3 MB/s
DQ Read 819
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 609
446% 595 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 160%
Great: 219%
OCZ Trion 100 480GB-$139
321GB free
Firmware: SAFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 134 127 147 128 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 484
Write 452
Mixed 378
SusWrite 167
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 91.5
4K Mixed 40.1
143% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 193
184% 288 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 90%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$40
496GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 68 67 67 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 86.3
Write 80.2
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 67.2
56% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 76%
Samsung HM641JI 640GB-$50
356GB free
Firmware: 2AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 76 76 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
44% Average
Read 78.1
Write 57.3
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 75
48% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44%
Great: 50%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 99 99 99 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 88.7
Write 99
Mixed 70
SusWrite 98
66% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.9% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 23.1
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 19.8
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 1,051 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $290

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $1,571
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback