Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive25% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-PRO/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateAug 25 '19 at 04:34
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$95
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 91.3
1-Core 116
2-Core 229
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 752
74% 605 Pts
64-Core 910
56% 910 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 240GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 0.3 3.1 22 0.4 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
25% Poor
Read 0.3
Write 206
Mixed 429
SusWrite 15.2
38% 163 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 12.8
4K Mixed 23.4
43% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 151
126% 184 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 25%
Great: 117%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 844GB
770GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 5.1 6.5 6.4 6.5 7.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.7% Very poor
Read 60.5
Write 15.5
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 6.3
18% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.2
220% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 30%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1.5TB
177GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 8.2 11 9.7 9.4 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 110
Write 16.2
Mixed 23
SusWrite 11.2
29% 40.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.2
123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35%
Great: 109%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 8.6 8.2 9 9.3 7.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 28% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 43
MC Write 43.2
MC Mixed 41.2
121% 42.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 22
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 109%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $1,023
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback