Lenovo ThinkServer TS140

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo ThinkServer TS140  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO ThinkServer TS140
Memory22.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150916
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateAug 25 '19 at 22:02
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 110
2-Core 208
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 572
56% 458 Pts
64-Core 567
35% 567 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.7% Poor
Lighting 34.7
Reflection 29.6
Parallax 39
28% 34.4 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 37.1
Splatting 34.7
30% 36.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
220GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 400 293 248 313 361 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 460
Mixed 354
SusWrite 333
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 97
4K Mixed 54.5
183% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 353
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 112%
Great: 134%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 31 30 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 29.9
Write 30.5
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 29.9
20% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.6
215% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 94%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 143 144 149 148 144 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 105
Write 128
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 143
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.6
300% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 94%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0909
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 11 16 19 14 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 87%
Seagate ST10000NE0004-1ZF101 10TB
5TB free
Firmware: EN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 145 146 149 147 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 141
Write 141
Mixed 83.9
SusWrite 146
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.9
322% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 83%
Great: 131%
Seagate FreeAgent 2TB
26GB free, PID 3008
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 38 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 39.9
Write 8.8
Mixed 15.5
SusWrite 38.6
32% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1333C9-8GAO 1324 F721GU67G1600G 0420 F3-1333C9-8GAO 1324 F721GU67G1600G 32GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.6% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 16.5
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ThinkServer TS140 Builds (Compare 326 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo ThinkServer TS140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $170
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback