Lenovo 20AWA15N00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemLenovo 20AWA15N00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20AWA15N00
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190521
Uptime5 Days
Run DateAug 29 '19 at 12:20
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User QAT-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-4300M-$264
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 87.4
1-Core 61.6
2-Core 100
55% 83.1 Pts
4-Core 133
8-Core 177
20% 155 Pts
64-Core 177
12% 177 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 220E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4963
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
2.75% Terrible
Lighting 3.83
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 5.78
3% 5.37 fps
MRender 4.62
Gravity 2.53
Splatting 7.52
2% 4.89 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.75%
Great: 3%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 750GB-$169
462GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR011
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 400 339 264 264 266 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 352
Write 418
Mixed 326
SusWrite 319
80% 354 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 60.8
4K Mixed 31.3
107% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 315
237% 317 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 81%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
29.4% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 7.7
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 10
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback