Asrock Z170 Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	9.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z170 Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160922
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 30 '16 at 12:02
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6600K-$130 342,244 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	95.1% Outstanding	Memory 96.3 1-Core 136 2-Core 272 94% 168 Pts	4-Core 542 8-Core 543 72% 542 Pts	64-Core 543 34% 543 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 95.1% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Gigabyte(1458 3555) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7563 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	9.38% Terrible	Lighting 10.4 Reflection 8.96 Parallax 9.78 8% 9.73 fps	MRender 14.2 Gravity 12.8 Splatting 13.7 11% 13.5 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.38% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 207GB free Firmware: Z22000RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 16 100 16 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 336 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1 (A9) Unknown 100 100 18 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 41 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 61 100 188978561063 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 107 (F1) Unknown 253 253 101 (F2) Unknown 253 253 63	80.9% Excellent	Read 510 Write 360 Mixed 234 81% 368 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 4.23 105% 45.5 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 257 DQ Mixed 28.1 75% 156 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 86%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 181GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2716 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 775 (B1) Unknown 98 98 23 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 55 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 43 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7602395139	108% Outstanding	Read 519 Write 395 Mixed 286 88% 400 MB/s	4K Read 44.5 4K Write 87.5 4K Mixed 42.3 168% 58.1 MB/s	DQ Read 300 DQ Write 229 DQ Mixed 105 122% 211 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 512GB free Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 193588336 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4558 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 76 60 13007131195 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 9440 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 3026 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (B8) Unknown 1 1 119 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 48 555024417 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 876 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 91 91 18123 (C2) HDA temperature 33 52 68719476769 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 73 4644 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 70304319674365 (F1) Unknown 100 253 9977302970 (F2) Unknown 100 253 12483245495	94.6% Outstanding	Read 166 Write 164 Mixed 103 107% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.86 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.39 104% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 94.6% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU32GX4M2C3000C15 1x16GB 283 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 16 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 20.3 SC Mixed 18.9 53% 18.6 GB/s	Latency 52.8 76% 52.8 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z170 Pro4 Builds (Compare 708 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 46%

Yacht

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 37%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z170 Pro4 - $110

CPU
Core i5-6600KIntel $130Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	215x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	143x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	92x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	80x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	75x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	49x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	24x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	20x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	39x
BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD 2x8GBCrucialBench 79%, 22,335 samples	16x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $501

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16