PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 90.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Gigabyte AB350M-D3H |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-AB350M-D3H-CF (all builds) |
Memory | 13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20170626 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 29 '19 at 19:05 |
Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 12% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
74.1%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$104
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.71
|
27.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 234 233 232 228 230 MB/s
|
90.6%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
401GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 87 87 88 88 MB/s
|
47.8%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
87.4%
Excellent
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 48x |
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $103Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 20x |
Ryzen 5 1400AMD $87Bench 61%, 71,313 samples | 19x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 17x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 16x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 11x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $319 |