Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	89.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	13.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH X58 (all builds)
Memory	18 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110802
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 30 '19 at 16:42
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	69% Good	Memory 88.5 1-Core 80.7 2-Core 161 66% 110 Pts	4-Core 271 8-Core 381 41% 326 Pts	64-Core 394 24% 394 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 360C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.35 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	89.8% Excellent	Lighting 94 Reflection 116 Parallax 128 77% 112 fps	MRender 123 Gravity 182 Splatting 123 115% 143 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 7.3 7.5 7.2 7.7 8.1 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	13.3% Very poor	Read 136 Write 8.5 Mixed 15.8 SusWrite 7.5 9% 42 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.4 28% 6.2 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 105GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 9.4 9.9 9 9 18 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.5% Average	Read 207 Write 202 Mixed 195 SusWrite 10.9 34% 154 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 46.3 4K Mixed 32.7 110% 35.9 MB/s	DQ Read 26.1 DQ Write 76.5 DQ Mixed 36.1 32% 46.2 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 134%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB 7,241 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 85GB free, PID 3312 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 20 21 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Read 31 Write 28.5 Mixed 26.8 SusWrite 19.5 35% 26.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 74%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 146GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 19 18 17 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	9.69% Terrible	Read 30.8 Write 26.5 Mixed 19.3 SusWrite 17.8 31% 23.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 9.69% Great: 43%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB 254 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 98GB free, PID ab34 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 131 145 146 141 123 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	59.1% Above average	Read 160 Write 116 Mixed 60.7 SusWrite 138 153% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 24GB 14,716 User benchmarks, average bench 43% null MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.9% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 8.1 26% 9.03 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 9.3 25% 8.9 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	605x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	291x
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	88x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	116x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	88x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	79x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	67x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	55x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	47x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	308x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	253x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	185x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $380

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16