| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock X370 Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180212 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 05 '19 at 23:11 |
| Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
| Run User | ZAF-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
83.5%
Excellent
|
82% 149 Pts
|
70% 548 Pts
|
59% 958 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.5.2
|
57.1%
Above average
|
58% 78.5 fps
|
55% 67.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 139 119 118 119 114 MB/s
|
108%
Outstanding
|
78% 347 MB/s
|
195% 69.5 MB/s
|
272% 363 MB/s
|
|
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
1TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 173 174 174 174 173 MB/s
|
97.3%
Outstanding
|
91% 127 MB/s
|
364% 2.77 MB/s
| |
|
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 36 37 36 36 MB/s
|
32.3%
Below average
|
44% 32.8 MB/s
|
228% 2.47 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C18 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
45.2%
Average
|
42% 14.8 GB/s
|
49% 17.2 GB/s
|
49% 80.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X370 Pro4 Builds (Compare 273 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock X370 Pro4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 45x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 26x |
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 23x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 23x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 13x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 13x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 97% - Outstanding | Total price: $320 |