Razer Blade Pro 17 (2019)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics37.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade Pro 17 (2019)  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA720
Memory56.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '19 at 07:25
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
45.3% Average
1-Core 85.1
2-Core 129
53% 107 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 256
31% 234 Pts
64-Core 282
19% 282 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Cards Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 3000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
3.56% Terrible
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 12.7
3% 14.3 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 12.6
Splatting 18.8
4% 14.1 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 3.56%
Great: 7%
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 3000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Lighting 135
Reflection 172
Parallax 203
35% 170 fps
MRender 40.7
Gravity 156
Splatting 141
38% 112 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 91%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$368
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 797 831 854 739 768 745 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 973
Write 943
Mixed 846
SusWrite 789
200% 888 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 26.6
112% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 576
DQ Write 496
DQ Mixed 545
406% 539 MB/s
Poor: 211%
This bench: 145%
Great: 391%
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
474GB free
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 794 821 780 584 588 599 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 1,063
Write 864
Mixed 804
SusWrite 694
192% 856 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 29.1
133% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 533
DQ Write 523
DQ Mixed 580
422% 545 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 148%
Great: 291%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
62.2% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 20.9
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 19.2
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 86%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Blade Pro 17 (2019) Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

System: Razer Blade Pro 17 (2019)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $260Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $58
Intel Core i7-9700K $360Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback