Performance Results


Gaming 123% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 103% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	143% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	69.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z170X-GamingG1 (all builds)
Memory	25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180309
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 12 '19 at 01:47
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	94%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	86.5% Excellent	Memory 96.7 1-Core 136 2-Core 243 91% 159 Pts	4-Core 412 8-Core 639 65% 525 Pts	64-Core 626 39% 626 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% EVGA(3842 2382) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.2 Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	143% Outstanding	Lighting 192 Reflection 203 Parallax 198 156% 198 fps	MRender 242 Gravity 197 Splatting 134 150% 191 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 143% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 255 265 253 278 272 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	69.2% Good	Read 350 Write 336 Mixed 316 SusWrite 268 72% 317 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 28 4K Mixed 21.9 73% 23.3 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 362 272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 97GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 303 311 336 385 344 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Read 407 Write 388 Mixed 340 SusWrite 327 82% 365 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 29.6 4K Mixed 25.6 81% 25.5 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 360 270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 134%
WD Blue 1TB-$105 6,748 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 837GB free Firmware: X41110WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 281 287 277 299 297 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Read 388 Write 381 Mixed 268 SusWrite 286 74% 331 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 21.8 4K Mixed 16.5 56% 17.9 MB/s	DQ Read 348 DQ Write 283 DQ Mixed 240 200% 290 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB 92,358 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75% Very good	MC Read 27.1 MC Write 28.2 MC Mixed 23.6 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 24.4 SC Mixed 20 60% 20.9 GB/s	Latency 51.4 78% 51.4 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 114%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 58%

Gunboat

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	6x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	6x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	6x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	6x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	5x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $139Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	5x

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $879

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16