Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 104% UFO	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 103% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	296% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190730
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 13 '19 at 13:50
Run Duration	279 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	92.3% Outstanding	Memory 92.8 1-Core 130 2-Core 246 88% 156 Pts	4-Core 492 8-Core 944 85% 718 Pts	64-Core 1,352 84% 1,352 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 119E) CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Lighting 139 Reflection 152 Parallax 139 113% 143 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 142 Splatting 113 100% 124 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB 77,062 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 772GB free (System drive) Firmware: S5Z42102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1187 1318 1732 1789 1790 1609 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	296% Outstanding	Read 1833 Write 1,806 Mixed 142 SusWrite 1,571 299% 1,338 MB/s	4K Read 60.4 4K Write 138 4K Mixed 80.9 268% 93 MB/s	DQ Read 1,085 DQ Write 866 DQ Mixed 434 472% 795 MB/s
Poor: 140% ↑ This bench: 296% Great: 311%
Fusion-io ioDrive2 1.205TB 206GB free Firmware: 7.1.17 rev 116786 Public SusWrite @10s intervals: 1056 1159 1156 1159 1148 1148 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G M.2 2280 256GB 834 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 238GB free Firmware: ABDA4102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 305 327 327 329 327 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 121%
Toshiba DT01ABA300 3TB 5,677 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2.5TB free Firmware: MZ6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 155 155 155 154 154 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	88.2% Excellent	Read 154 Write 156 Mixed 34.4 SusWrite 154 90% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 137% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 88%
WD Blue 750GB (2008)-$72 4,659 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 257GB free Firmware: 30.04G30 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 72 72 71 72 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	38% Below average	Read 60.1 Write 64 Mixed 48.3 SusWrite 71.6 45% 61 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 52%
WD Blue 750GB (2008)-$72 4,659 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 689GB free Firmware: 30.04G30 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 93 93 94 94 94 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Read 91.1 Write 91.7 Mixed 62.5 SusWrite 93.8 62% 84.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 52%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB 7,568 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 916GB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 130 131 131 131 130 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Read 122 Write 128 Mixed 111 SusWrite 131 169% 123 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 130% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 105%
WD My Book 1130 2TB 1,666 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 545GB free, PID 1130 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 76 76 76 76 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	39.1% Below average	Read 110 Write 105 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 75.9 125% 93.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 95% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB 6,687 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	MC Read 47.1 MC Write 41.7 MC Mixed 34.8 118% 41.2 GB/s	SC Read 28.6 SC Write 45.2 SC Mixed 31.9 101% 35.2 GB/s	Latency 62.4 64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 128%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,854 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,434x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	306x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	281x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	234x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	231x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	202x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	189x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	188x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	177x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	202x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	142x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	134x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,013

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)