PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 32.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Gigabyte H110M-Gaming 3 |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H110M-Gaming3-CF (all builds) |
Memory | 10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170725 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 15 '19 at 04:19 |
Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
Run User | URY-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
64.2%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 378E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.30
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
22%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE300000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 33 35 32 37 30 MB/s
|
32.5%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
345GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 130 130 131 132 MB/s
|
87.8%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
51.2%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 64x |
Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples | 45x |
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 39x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 71x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 32x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 28x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $249 |