Lenovo 3392C4S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 3392C4S  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130321
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 16 '19 at 15:57
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User URY-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 83
1-Core 103
2-Core 204
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 504
54% 431 Pts
64-Core 519
32% 519 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
Legend(17AA 3084) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4885
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.96% Terrible
Lighting 4.27
Reflection 5.81
Parallax 2.94
4% 4.34 fps
MRender 5.86
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 0.09
2% 2.76 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.96%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$80
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 28 30 37 36 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 36.7
Write 31
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 35.4
24% 32.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
117% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5040ED58E9W1600 0443 RMR5040ED58E9W1600 Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.8% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 7.6
24% 8.27 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 8.6
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback