Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics66.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory43.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150612
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 18 '19 at 07:10
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 95.5
2-Core 185
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 598
56% 466 Pts
64-Core 984
61% 984 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.5% Good
Lighting 87.4
Reflection 84.9
Parallax 76.2
71% 82.8 fps
MRender 68.7
Gravity 75.4
Splatting 66.7
57% 70.3 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$160
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 270 139 125 117 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 440
Write 414
Mixed 328
SusWrite 193
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 74.1
4K Mixed 44.2
148% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 270
203% 271 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 134%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
206GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 59 58 59 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 98.8
Write 95.5
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 58.7
63% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 67%
Hitachi HDS5C4040ALE630 4TB
896GB free
Firmware: MPAOA3B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 115 113 115 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 122
Write 123
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 114
69% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78
280GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 72 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 123
Write 121
Mixed 79.8
SusWrite 71.1
73% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 84%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$169
6TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 170 164 174 175 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 139
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 167
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1
283% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$143
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 40.6
MC Write 41.9
MC Mixed 39.8
116% 40.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 19.5
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 103%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $770
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback