Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150805
Uptime2 Days
Run DateSep 22 '19 at 17:33
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 52.9
2-Core 104
54% 82.3 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 290
30% 242 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
EVGA(3842 2678) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1552 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
29.8% Poor
Lighting 34.2
Reflection 35.3
Parallax 43.7
28% 37.8 fps
MRender 49.2
Gravity 40.6
Splatting 35.6
34% 41.8 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 293 295 293 279 203 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 340
Write 264
Mixed 198
SusWrite 261
60% 265 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 60.8
4K Mixed 8
70% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 26.3
DQ Write 88.6
DQ Mixed 9.2
21% 41.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52%
Great: 86%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 166 164 168 167 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 176
Write 173
Mixed 104
SusWrite 160
205% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
140% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 105%
USB DISK 3.0 32GB
28GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 11 11 11 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
7.66% Terrible
Read 26.5
Write 18.3
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 11.1
19% 15.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.66%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.8% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 12.2
32% 11 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 9.4
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback