HP EliteBook Folio 9470m

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	96.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP EliteBook Folio 9470m (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 18DF
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190412
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 30 '19 at 06:32
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	EST-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3687U 2,933 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Memory 80.5 1-Core 89.1 2-Core 138 63% 102 Pts	4-Core 216 8-Core 214 29% 215 Pts	64-Core 216 13% 216 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 18DF) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.45% Terrible	Lighting 3.77 Reflection 4.19 Parallax 2.81 3% 3.59 fps	MRender 5.43 Gravity 2.27 Splatting 6.96 4% 4.88 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.45% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
MT-256 256GB 385 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 188GB free (System drive) Firmware: H180806 SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 444 456 440 441 440 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	96.4% Outstanding	Read 456 Write 427 Mixed 408 SusWrite 439 98% 433 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 85.3 4K Mixed 33.5 126% 47.8 MB/s	DQ Read 268 DQ Write 308 DQ Mixed 332 238% 303 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 96.4% Great: 99%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 225GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 228 230 233 231 232 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	83.9% Excellent	Read 442 Write 429 Mixed 319 SusWrite 251 81% 360 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 57.9 4K Mixed 33.3 111% 38.6 MB/s	DQ Read 389 DQ Write 350 DQ Mixed 338 262% 359 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
M378B5273EBO-YKO 2x8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 16.9 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 17.7 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 79.5 50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook Folio 9470m Builds (Compare 953 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook Folio 9470m

CPU
Core i5-3437UIntelBench 49%, 3,817 samples	339x
Core i5-3427UIntelBench 49%, 4,182 samples	313x
Core i7-3687UIntelBench 53%, 2,933 samples	171x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	952x
Ivy 4PhdgdBench 4%, 153 samples	1x

SSD
SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GBIntel $209Bench 69%, 7,834 samples	65x
520 Series 180GBIntel $132Bench 72%, 14,258 samples	41x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	27x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	28x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	25x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 4% - Terrible

Total price: $209

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16