PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 26.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-X48-DS5 (all builds) |
Memory | 3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20090424 |
Uptime | 1.6 Days |
Run Date | Oct 01 '19 at 10:39 |
Run Duration | 252 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 47% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
|
38.3%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
|
21.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 23 44 46 43 46 MB/s
|
26.1%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate ST3750640AS 750GB-$60
82GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 18 18 MB/s
|
18.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate ST31500541AS 1.5TB
429GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 18 18 18 MB/s
|
29%
Poor
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
903GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 112 122 126 127 124 MB/s
|
83.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55
298GB free
Firmware: 3.AHG
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 64 60 60 59 60 MB/s
|
38.7%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
2TB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 123 124 125 124 MB/s
|
57%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
263GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 61 63 63 64 MB/s
|
47.6%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
531GB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 63 65 65 66 65 MB/s
|
39.3%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
16.1%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q9450Intel $110Bench 49%, 5,335 samples | 5x |
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 4x |
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 4x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 4x |
GeForce GTX 470NvidiaBench 16%, 5,537 samples | 2x |
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 41% - Average | Total price: $362 |