Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4000 14,024 User benchmarks, average bench 24% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	21.9% Poor	Memory 27.3 1-Core 16 2-Core 36 17% 26.4 Pts	4-Core 94.9 8-Core 98.1 13% 96.5 Pts	64-Core 102 6% 102 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CV8-8E128-HP 128GB 7,685 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: V881 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 77 85 79 79 84 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	39% Below average	Read 314 Write 134 Mixed 104 SusWrite 85.2 35% 159 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 22.8 4K Mixed 16 50% 16.9 MB/s	DQ Read 97.1 DQ Write 143 DQ Mixed 131 96% 124 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 1x4GB 18,494 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.9% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 5.7 18% 6.33 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 2.5 9% 3.3 GB/s	Latency 271 15% 271 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 40%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4000IntelBench 24%, 14,024 samples	265x
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	143x
Core i3-1005G1IntelBench 44%, 22,960 samples	110x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	357x
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	253x
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	113x

SSD
CV8-8E128-HP 128GBLiteonBench 66%, 7,685 samples	101x
MZNLN128HAHQ-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 78%, 14,590 samples	59x
CV8-8E128-HP 128GBSsstcBench 63%, 1,207 samples	39x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	199x
RMSA3260NA78HAF-2666 1x8GBRamaxelBench 38%, 4,752 samples	55x
M471A5244CB0-CWE 1x4GBSamsungBench 34%, 6,590 samples	34x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16