Asrock X58 Extreme3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X58 Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130412
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateOct 06 '19 at 16:26
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$100
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 75.8
1-Core 75
2-Core 140
58% 96.8 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 350
37% 297 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 8628) 2GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28% Poor
Lighting 34.8
Reflection 24.8
Parallax 30.4
28% 30 fps
MRender 36
Gravity 32.6
Splatting 31.9
27% 33.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Marvell Raid VD 0 1TB
760GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MV.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 68 63 67 71 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 318
Write 200
Mixed 214
SusWrite 79.4
45% 203 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 22
4K Mixed 17.6
58% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 68.7
DQ Write 72.5
DQ Mixed 76.7
56% 72.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 117%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$497
180GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 57 59 63 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 40.5
Write 49.2
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 59.2
32% 43.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 61%
WD WD7502AAEX-00Y9A0 750GB
579GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 119 120 120 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 130
Write 111
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 120
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
38.8% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 14.8
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 10.9
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock X58 Extreme3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $300
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback