Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 (all builds)
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120810
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 08 '19 at 13:15
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6100-$68 44,863 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	32% Below average	Memory 55.9 1-Core 29 2-Core 56.4 32% 47.1 Pts	4-Core 54.1 8-Core 28.3 6% 41.2 Pts	64-Core 12 1% 12 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200 83,027 User benchmarks, average bench 33% XFX(1682 9380) CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.8.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.3% Poor	Lighting 27 Reflection 50 Parallax 52.6 22% 43.2 fps	MRender 50.6 Gravity 42.5 Splatting 36.3 34% 43.1 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF500000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 69 31 11 8.1 13 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	21.5% Poor	Read 139 Write 146 Mixed 116 SusWrite 29.8 24% 108 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 14.9 4K Mixed 11.8 43% 13.2 MB/s	DQ Read 17.6 DQ Write 24 DQ Mixed 19.7 15% 20.4 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 55%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44 34,705 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 105GB free Firmware: 4.AAA SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 66 69 68 68 69 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	29.5% Poor	Read 35.9 Write 29 Mixed 31.2 SusWrite 66.8 30% 40.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 54%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 456GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 72 45 17 8.3 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	45.7% Average	Read 124 Write 122 Mixed 58 SusWrite 35.4 62% 84.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	25.6% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 10.9 26% 9 GB/s	SC Read 5.8 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 8.2 19% 6.63 GB/s	Latency 140 28% 140 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 Builds (Compare 1,060 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 - $100

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	268x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	184x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	134x

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	64x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	63x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	49x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	26x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	23x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	199x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	186x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	175x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $175

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16