Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	30.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v4 1,172 User benchmarks, average bench 51% None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	52% Above average	Memory 58.8 1-Core 79.3 2-Core 146 54% 94.8 Pts	4-Core 243 8-Core 408 40% 326 Pts	64-Core 395 24% 395 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Virtual HD 275GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 82 85 86 85 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.9% Below average	Read 135 Write 136 Mixed 129 SusWrite 83.9 27% 121 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 14.8 4K Mixed 15.8 57% 16.5 MB/s	DQ Read 66 DQ Write 65 DQ Mixed 64.9 49% 65.3 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 75%
Virtual HD 69GB 72 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 59GB free Firmware: 1.1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 49 50 48 47 47 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.1% Poor	Read 130 Write 128 Mixed 128 SusWrite 48.4 24% 109 MB/s	4K Read 11.7 4K Write 13.5 4K Mixed 11 39% 12.1 MB/s	DQ Read 65.3 DQ Write 64 DQ Mixed 65.1 49% 64.8 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 32GB 5,781 User benchmarks, average bench 53% null MHz 1024, 31744 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	93.1% Outstanding	MC Read 31.3 MC Write 44.5 MC Mixed 39 109% 38.3 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 11.4 SC Mixed 11.4 28% 9.9 GB/s	Latency 131 30% 131 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 101%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,139x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,039x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	820x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	455x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16