Performance Results


Gaming 99% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 100% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	96.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190506
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 10 '19 at 10:25
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Memory 84.6 1-Core 123 2-Core 246 84% 151 Pts	4-Core 407 8-Core 770 70% 589 Pts	64-Core 1,308 81% 1,308 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 379F) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48 Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	118% Outstanding	Lighting 158 Reflection 151 Parallax 148 129% 152 fps	MRender 178 Gravity 139 Splatting 104 111% 140 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 235GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 464 407 331 364 404 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	96.7% Outstanding	Read 481 Write 188 Mixed 194 SusWrite 388 70% 313 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 82.2 4K Mixed 33.6 132% 48.6 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 222 DQ Mixed 172 164% 260 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 96.7% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB 35,237 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 284GB free Firmware: RVT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 466 468 474 431 287 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 462 Mixed 455 SusWrite 430 104% 463 MB/s	4K Read 40.8 4K Write 98.3 4K Mixed 55.9 186% 65 MB/s	DQ Read 313 DQ Write 294 DQ Mixed 303 228% 303 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 126%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 197 198 197 198 200 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 157 Mixed 85 SusWrite 197 114% 156 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU32GX4M2C3000C15 2x16GB 6,222 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 39.9 MC Write 34.7 MC Mixed 35.5 105% 36.7 GB/s	SC Read 26.2 SC Write 38.2 SC Mixed 31.7 92% 32 GB/s	Latency 72.5 55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 102%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 97%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	54x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	43x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	41x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	55x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	38x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	34x

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $1,069

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16