PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20160504 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 16 '19 at 00:32 |
Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 26% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
56.8%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.30
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
16.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CR100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 79 74 71 73 MB/s
|
33.9%
Below average
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$8
8GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 6.3 7.5 7.7 7.6 MB/s
|
19.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLT8G3D1608DT1TX0. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
38.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 859x |
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples | 207x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 145x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 109x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 83x |
RX 580AMD $140Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 80x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $630 |