Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 105% UFO	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 119% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	56.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus Z9PE-D8 WS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory	55 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, , 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150610
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Oct 16 '19 at 17:14
Run Duration	218 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0 1,646 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Memory 83.6 1-Core 99.8 2-Core 191 72% 125 Pts	4-Core 359 8-Core 725 64% 542 Pts	64-Core 1,824 113% 1,824 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% EVGA(3842 2487) CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.48 Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	136% Outstanding	Lighting 164 Reflection 216 Parallax 250 134% 210 fps	MRender 264 Gravity 227 Splatting 145 166% 212 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 136% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 480GB-$249 1,770 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: 400i SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 172 154 154 159 137 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Read 451 Write 226 Mixed 272 SusWrite 157 61% 277 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 18.7 4K Mixed 20.8 72% 21 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 93.6 DQ Mixed 127 102% 147 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 71%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 406GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 212 220 215 222 212 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	67.3% Good	Read 257 Write 234 Mixed 235 SusWrite 214 53% 235 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 49.9 4K Mixed 34.8 112% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 197 148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 91GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 161 125 110 105 94 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	84% Excellent	Read 472 Write 442 Mixed 353 SusWrite 156 80% 356 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 56.9 4K Mixed 39.1 126% 42.2 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 230 208% 317 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 118%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 265GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 211 219 214 221 211 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	66.6% Good	Read 256 Write 232 Mixed 238 SusWrite 212 53% 235 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 48.1 4K Mixed 34 110% 36.5 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 197 148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 133%
Hitachi HDS721010KLA330 1TB-$47 10,943 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 461GB free Firmware: GKAOA70M SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 54 53 52 54 52 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	33% Below average	Read 61.9 Write 53.9 Mixed 40 SusWrite 52.6 38% 52.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 46%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 383GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 113 115 109 114 109 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Read 141 Write 140 Mixed 93.8 SusWrite 111 90% 122 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.1 220% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965516-057.A00 8x8GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	98.7% Outstanding	MC Read 45.2 MC Write 40.4 MC Mixed 34.9 115% 40.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 7.3 26% 8.97 GB/s	Latency 74.1 54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 98.7% Great: 99%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 89%

Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	19x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	16x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	15x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $274Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	14x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	14x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	10x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	12x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $190Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x

RAM
M393B1G73QH0-YK 8x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 8 samples	7x
HMT31GR7EFR4C-R 7x8GBHynixBench 91%, 9 samples	7x
9905403-582.A00 8x8GBKingstonBench 85%, 7 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $383

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16