Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	60.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	24 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170407
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 16 '19 at 19:01
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	46%

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	64.9% Good	Memory 61.9 1-Core 101 2-Core 193 66% 119 Pts	4-Core 364 8-Core 629 60% 497 Pts	64-Core 958 59% 958 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon-VII-$841 13,762 User benchmarks, average bench 101% AMD(1002 081E) Ram: 16GB, Driver: 19.8.2 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	60.9% Good	Lighting 63 Reflection 49.3 Parallax 102 51% 71.4 fps	MRender 94.8 Gravity 124 Splatting 79 80% 99.3 fps
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: 521ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 77 91 97 84 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	45.6% Average	Read 99.3 Write 144 Mixed 120 SusWrite 92.5 26% 114 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 69.1 4K Mixed 27.5 93% 36.8 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 156 DQ Mixed 128 104% 148 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 85%
Samsung MZ7LN512HMJP-00000 512GB 425 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 13GB free Firmware: MAV0100Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 404 Write 403 Mixed 344 86% 384 MB/s	4K Read 33.7 4K Write 83.6 4K Mixed 45.1 153% 54.1 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 361 272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 131%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 82GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 390 400 385 385 381 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 422 Write 408 Mixed 392 SusWrite 387 91% 402 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 82.2 4K Mixed 43.9 147% 52.3 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 364 274% 365 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 133%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74 163,917 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 106GB free Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 670 100 131 140 100 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	146% Outstanding	Read 1,178 Write 1,211 Mixed 869 SusWrite 207 194% 866 MB/s	4K Read 40.2 4K Write 87.8 4K Mixed 53.4 176% 60.5 MB/s	DQ Read 629 DQ Write 789 DQ Mixed 268 325% 562 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑ This bench: 146% Great: 255%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 158GB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 59 67 68 62 62 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	43.8% Average	Read 88.5 Write 39.3 Mixed 59 SusWrite 63.6 46% 62.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GB-$74 29,684 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	56% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 22.3 62% 21.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 10.8 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 524 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	21x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $856

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)