Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 13% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom Z3745 428 User benchmarks, average bench 31% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	28.1% Poor	Memory 44.9 1-Core 17 2-Core 35 23% 32.3 Pts	4-Core 66.8 8-Core 67.5 9% 67.2 Pts	64-Core 66.5 4% 66.5 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 34%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 7270) 1GB Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.78% Terrible	Lighting 0.83 Reflection 1 Parallax 0.88 1% 0.9 fps	MRender 1.57 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 1.22 1% 1.19 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.78% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MBG4GC 31GB 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.11 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	21.8% Poor	Read 162 Write 55 Mixed 83.5 22% 100 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 14.9 4K Mixed 4.1 40% 12.2 MB/s	DQ Read 17.7 DQ Write 17.1 DQ Mixed 3.12 6% 12.7 MB/s

Generic SL128 SD Card 128GB 179 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 116GB free Firmware: 8.0 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	6.18% Terrible	Read 11.5 Write 8.59 Mixed 9.85 8% 9.97 MB/s	4K Read 3.09 4K Write 1.58 4K Mixed 1.1 280% 1.92 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.18% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
To be filled by O.E.M be filled by O.E.M 1x2GB 2,198 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 5.4 15% 5.4 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 3.7 9% 3.2 GB/s	Latency 181 22% 181 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 22%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM