Packard imedia S1800

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemPackard imedia S1800  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard Veriton M275
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100612
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateOct 17 '19 at 16:44
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Pentium E5800-$45
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
27% Poor
1-Core 56.7
2-Core 101
38% 79 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 102
14% 103 Pts
64-Core 108
7% 108 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27%
Great: 29%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Sapphire(174B E153) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1501.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.87% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 5.3
1% 4.93 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 4.7
1% 3.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.87%
Great: 1%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$51
486GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 76 60 65 60 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 62.3
Write 30.3
Mixed 9
SusWrite 68.5
31% 42.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
101% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 58%
General USB Flash Disk 8GB
1GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 6.3 6.3 5.3 6.3 6.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
3.27% Terrible
Read 8.3
Write 3.8
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 6
7% 5.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.27%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
13.9% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 3.6
12% 4.07 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 3.6
8% 2.67 GB/s
Latency 87
46% 87 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 53%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical imedia S1800 Builds (Compare 149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Packard imedia S1800

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Below average Total price: $44
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $270Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $58
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback