Teclast F7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 29%
Workstation 17%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemTeclast F7  (all builds)
MotherboardTECLAST F7
Memory3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180911
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 18 '19 at 17:32
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Celeron N3450
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
29.9% Poor
1-Core 43.7
2-Core 87
31% 65.3 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 168
23% 170 Pts
64-Core 176
12% 176 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 31%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.1% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 7.1
Parallax 5
2% 6.2 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 12.7
2% 9.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.1%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Teclast 128GB NS550-2242 128GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0927A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 141 148 150 150 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 384
Write 135
Mixed 152
SusWrite 146
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 9.3
58% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 56.5
73% 132 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x1.5GB
4 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
27.7% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 10.1
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 3.6
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 197
20% 197 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 31%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical F7 Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 27%
Workstation 16%

System: Teclast F7

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $43
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback