Gigabyte GA-E7AUM-DS2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-E7AUM-DS2H  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090826
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateOct 18 '19 at 21:53
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Extreme X9650-$850
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Memory 25.5
1-Core 24.1
2-Core 69.6
22% 39.7 Pts
4-Core 144
8-Core 152
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9400
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.78% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.69
Parallax 0.38
1% 1.02 fps
MRender 2.19
Gravity 0.27
Splatting 0.39
1% 0.95 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.78%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 75 75 27 22 20 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.3% Very poor
Read 208
Write 76.5
Mixed 107
SusWrite 46.6
24% 109 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2.8
29% 6.83 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 110%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
310GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 58 58 57 59 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 57.8
Write 53.3
Mixed 35
SusWrite 58
38% 51 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 43%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 109 111 111 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 129
Write 115
Mixed 66
SusWrite 110
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 88%
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70
427GB free
Firmware: 1AA0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 90 92 87 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 104
Write 103
Mixed 58
SusWrite 89.8
65% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
196% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 3.4
12% 4.33 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 2.2
6% 2.07 GB/s
Latency 283
14% 283 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-E7AUM-DS2H Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-E7AUM-DS2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $100
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback