Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	75% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	95.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B61
Motherboard	MSI Z370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B61) (all builds)
Memory	1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180307
Uptime	11.5 Days
Run Date	Oct 22 '19 at 23:02
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	40%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173 264,837 User benchmarks, average bench 91% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	Memory 78.3 1-Core 129 2-Core 258 85% 155 Pts	4-Core 500 8-Core 619 72% 560 Pts	64-Core 652 40% 652 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3304) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	75% Very good	Lighting 94.1 Reflection 99.4 Parallax 83.4 77% 92.3 fps	MRender 88 Gravity 87.2 Splatting 88 72% 87.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 293 298 304 302 303 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	95.9% Outstanding	Read 460 Write 306 Mixed 262 SusWrite 299 74% 331 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 96.6 4K Mixed 36.8 144% 54.6 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 298 DQ Mixed 232 203% 305 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 95.9% Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 242GB free Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 100 101 100 124 124 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Read 146 Write 140 Mixed 77.5 SusWrite 107 86% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 125% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 112%
VendorCo ProductCode 16GB 7,454 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 12GB free, PID 5678 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.7 6.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	4.35% Terrible	Read 16.5 Write 6.2 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 6.4 10% 8.33 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 9% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.35% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR4 2133 C15 1x8GB 11,823 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	29.3% Poor	MC Read 12 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 8.8 29% 10 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 8 19% 6.77 GB/s	Latency 83.7 48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	338x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	247x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	187x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	379x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	179x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	165x

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $834

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16