Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO

Performance Results


Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 68% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	80.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO (all builds)
Memory	25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181207
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 24 '19 at 14:46
Run Duration	283 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	78.3% Very good	Memory 68.7 1-Core 117 2-Core 233 76% 140 Pts	4-Core 470 8-Core 896 81% 683 Pts	64-Core 1,264 78% 1,264 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 859F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	80.2% Excellent	Lighting 99.2 Reflection 111 Parallax 102 81% 104 fps	MRender 97.5 Gravity 95.4 Splatting 96.6 79% 96.5 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 450GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1194 897 898 895 880 880 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	212% Outstanding	Read 1,963 Write 1,753 Mixed 679 SusWrite 941 297% 1,334 MB/s	4K Read 36.5 4K Write 92.2 4K Mixed 55.3 175% 61.3 MB/s	DQ Read 501 DQ Write 462 DQ Mixed 512 376% 492 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 212% Great: 302%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$137 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 3TB free Firmware: AR17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 159 159 157 161 161 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$137 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 1.5TB free Firmware: AR17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 114 117 116 116 116 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180 4,231 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 813GB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 108 102 104 104 112 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Read 107 Write 113 Mixed 57 SusWrite 104 70% 95.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.4 241% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 97%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180 4,231 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 6.5TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 168 162 161 178 166 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	97.1% Outstanding	Read 173 Write 172 Mixed 80.3 SusWrite 166 108% 148 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.3 226% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 97.1% Great: 97%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 3.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 173 173 172 175 175 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	99.4% Outstanding	Read 173 Write 160 Mixed 90 SusWrite 173 109% 149 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 99.4% Great: 100%
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 291GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 40 39 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Read 36.5 Write 26.9 Mixed 30.7 SusWrite 39.4 45% 33.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 46%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB 12,029 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 1TB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 83 86 89 83 86 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	38.3% Below average	Read 92 Write 104 Mixed 65 SusWrite 85.4 118% 86.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.3 116% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB-$190 7,103 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	65% Good	MC Read 24.6 MC Write 22 MC Mixed 22 65% 22.9 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 25.2 SC Mixed 22.2 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 142%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CROSSHAIR VI HERO Builds (Compare 1,742 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 92%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 91%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO - $227

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	277x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	206x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	191x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	193x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	155x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	115x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	88x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	60x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	53x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	69x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	44x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $855

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16