MSI 785GM-E51 (MS-7596)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics41.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-7596
MotherboardMSI 785GM-E51 (MS-7596)  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110218
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 26 '19 at 15:24
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 46%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Memory 50.7
1-Core 39.9
2-Core 77.8
35% 56.1 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 114
16% 117 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
MSI(1462 809E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.1% Average
Lighting 48
Reflection 57.5
Parallax 66.1
39% 57.2 fps
MRender 63.1
Gravity 49.1
Splatting 54
45% 55.4 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 225
Write 200
Mixed 204
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 30.5
4K Mixed 21
70% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 122
95% 131 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
936GB free
Firmware: MX4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 97 97 98 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 144
Write 145
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 97.7
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 108%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 16GB
13GB free, PID 005b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 7.3 7.3 7.1 7 7.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
5.19% Terrible
Read 18.8
Write 5.3
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 7.1
12% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.19%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
28.3% Poor
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 11.3
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 6.1
13% 4.63 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 785GM-E51 (MS-7596) Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 785GM-E51 (MS-7596)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $142
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback