Asus P8H77-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics89.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H77-M  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140307
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 28 '19 at 15:11
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 44%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Memory 93.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 206
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 398
54% 402 Pts
64-Core 403
25% 403 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB; Gigabyte RTX 2060 6GB Windforce OC
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 440.97
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.8% Excellent
Lighting 114
Reflection 112
Parallax 108
93% 111 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 97.5
Splatting 84.3
84% 106 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 262 276 265 255 242 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 398
Write 376
Mixed 324
SusWrite 257
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 40.9
146% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 42.4
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 57.2
50% 72.7 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
150GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 100 99 96 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 95.7
Write 95.5
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 98.6
65% 88 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 69%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
56GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 19 38 34 32 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 95.5
Write 61.3
Mixed 38
SusWrite 32.9
69% 56.9 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2.2
152% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54.5% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 17.3
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 62
65% 62 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H77-M Builds (Compare 935 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $454
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback